Michigan Senate Bill SB0045

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/23
• Refer: 1/26/23
• Report Pass: 11/7/23
• Refer: 11/7/23
• Report Pass: 11/8/23
• Engrossed: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/8/23

Caption

Health occupations: health professionals; definition of invasive bodily examination; add. Amends secs. 16105 & 16106 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16105 & 333.16106). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0044'23

Impact

The proposed changes under SB 45 are set to impact the field of healthcare significantly in Michigan by refining legal definitions that govern health professions. This legislative measure seeks to enhance the regulatory framework surrounding health occupations, thereby ensuring that practitioners understand their roles and responsibilities in the context of newly defined standards. With the introduction of a 'health profession specialty field license', the bill aims to better categorize health professions based on their training and expertise, promoting higher operational standards within these specialties.

Summary

Senate Bill 45 aims to amend the Michigan Public Health Code specifically regarding the definitions of 'health occupations' and 'invasive bodily examinations'. The bill clarifies the terms used to define health occupations, introduces the concept of specialty licenses for health professionals, and specifies what constitutes incompetence regarding medical practice. Notably, it addresses the connotations associated with invasive bodily examinations, thus ensuring a clearer understanding of these procedures within healthcare regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 45 appears to be supportive among healthcare professionals who seek clearer guidelines and definitions within the Public Health Code. Advocates argue that the amendments will improve the practice environment by delineating the boundaries of health professions and the conduct expected of practitioners. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of defining invasive procedures, particularly how these definitions may influence the practice protocols and the liability of healthcare providers.

Contention

A point of contention in the discussions surrounding SB 45 relates to the definitions of invasive bodily examinations and their implications for practitioners. Critics may argue that while specifying these definitions is necessary, it could also cause apprehension regarding the legal responsibilities of healthcare providers. Additionally, the tie to Senate Bill No. 44 suggests that legislative support may hinge on the passage of additional measures that aim to further clarify or adjust provisions in healthcare regulations.