Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2832

Introduced
1/19/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Introduced
1/19/24  
Report Pass
2/16/24  
Refer
1/24/24  
Report Pass
2/16/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
2/16/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/1/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Engrossed
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  
Refer
3/7/24  
Report Pass
3/22/24  

Caption

Relating To The Traffic Code.

Impact

The provisions of SB2832, if enacted, will update and solidify the authority of counties to regulate parking and stopping on highways specifically under their jurisdiction. This change is seen as a means to reduce ambiguity in traffic enforcement and provide clear guidelines for both law enforcement and drivers. By formalizing the process for issuing traffic infractions at the county level, the bill aims to facilitate more immediate responses to violations that may hinder traffic safety and flow, thus potentially reducing congestion and associated roadway hazards.

Summary

Senate Bill 2832 aims to amend certain sections of Hawaii's traffic code, particularly regarding the stopping, standing, and parking of vehicles on highways. The bill allows counties to issue citations for traffic infractions stemming from these stopping and parking regulations. This stipulation is intended to enhance local enforcement capabilities while ensuring that traffic flow and safety are not compromised. It further clarifies that counties cannot impose additional penalties beyond those set forth in district court for these violations, reinforcing a streamlined approach for managing parking compliance on highways.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2832 from legislative discussions has generally been supportive among committee members who emphasize the need for stronger local control over traffic regulations. The sentiment is rooted in the belief that local governments are better positioned to address unique traffic conditions and patterns inherent to their regions. However, there are concerns regarding the uniformity of traffic regulations across the state, with some legislators advocating for a balance between local autonomy and statewide consistency in traffic enforcement.

Contention

Debate on SB2832 has highlighted concerns about the implications of allowing counties to unilaterally enforce traffic regulations. Some opponents argue that this could lead to a patchwork of varied regulations that may confuse drivers and undermine broader traffic law consistency. Additionally, apprehensions about potential disparities in how different counties interpret and enforce the traffic code could lead to enforcement inequities, complicating compliance for motorists. The bill's implementation raises questions about uniformity and fairness in traffic law enforcement across diverse jurisdictions within the state.

Companion Bills

HI HB2295

Same As Relating To The Traffic Code.

Similar Bills

CA AB1384

Civil rights.

CA AB1438

Civil rights.

CA AB1991

Motels and hotels: publicly funded shelter programs.

CA AB670

Common interest developments: accessory dwelling units.

CA SB652

Entry doors: display of religious items: prohibitions.

CT HB06576

An Act Authorizing The Installation Of Stop Signs By The Traffic Authority Of Certain State Facilities.

DC B25-0482

Releasing Restrictive Covenants in Deeds Act of 2023

CA AB1625

Inoperable parking meters.