Maine House Bill LD853

Maine 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/23

Caption

RESOLUTION, Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of Maine to Establish a Right to Housing

Impact

The ratification of LD853 would profoundly impact state laws by grounding the right to housing within the constitutional framework. It would obligate the state to ensure that all residents have access to adequate housing, potentially leading to the implementation of new policies and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing availability. This amendment joins a broader national conversation about housing security and could inspire similar initiatives in other states, reinforcing the argument that access to housing is not just a privilege but a fundamental right warranting protection under the law.

Summary

LD853 is a proposed resolution that seeks to amend the Constitution of Maine to establish a clear and unequivocal right to housing for all individuals. The bill emphasizes that everyone has a natural and inherent right to housing, reflecting a growing recognition of housing as a fundamental human right. If passed, this amendment would require a statewide election where voters can ratify the change to the constitution, signaling a significant shift in the state's legislative landscape regarding housing policies.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding LD853 appears to be largely positive among advocates of housing rights, who view the bill as a critical step toward ensuring housing equality and combating homelessness. Supporters argue that enshrining this right in the constitution would serve to protect vulnerable populations and guarantee that housing remains a priority in state policymaking. However, there is also concern among opponents who question the feasibility of implementing such a right and its implications for existing housing policies and regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the practical implications of declaring a constitutional right to housing. Opponents worry that the amendment could lead to increased government intervention in the housing market, increase costs for taxpayers, and create a potential overreach in housing regulations. Advocates, however, argue that such measures are necessary to address systemic issues within the housing market, including scarcity and affordability, thus framing the debate as both a moral and economic imperative.