Michigan House Bill HB4144

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/23
• Refer: 2/28/23
• Report Pass: 3/22/23
• Engrossed: 3/22/23
• Refer: 3/23/23
• Refer: 4/26/23

Caption

Crimes: weapons; penalties for storing or leaving a firearm where it may be accessed by a minor; provide for. Amends sec. 15 of 1927 PA 372 (MCL 28.435) & adds sec. 9.

Impact

If enacted, HB 4144 would impose strict penalties for violations of the safe storage requirements. Individuals could face misdemeanor charges if minors access firearms improperly, with escalating penalties up to felonies for more severe consequences, such as injury or death resulting from the misuse of the firearm by the minor. This could fundamentally alter the legal landscape for firearm ownership in Michigan, making responsible storage a legal obligation with serious ramifications for non-compliance.

Summary

House Bill 4144 is an amendment to the 1927 PA 372 that deals specifically with firearm storage and the associated responsibilities of individuals regarding minor access. The bill mandates that individuals who store or leave firearms unattended know, or should reasonably know, that minors are likely to be present. To comply, they must store firearms in locked containers or keep them unloaded and secured. The legislation aims to reduce the instances where minors could gain unauthorized access to firearms, thereby enhancing public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 4144 appears divided, reflecting broader national debates on gun rights and safety measures involving firearms. Supporters argue that the legislation is a critical step toward preventing accidents and enhancing child safety, viewing it as a necessary precaution in contexts where firearms are present in households. Conversely, opponents may express concerns about potential overreach in personal freedoms and the implications of criminal penalties for what they might consider mistakes in firearm management.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between firearm rights and public safety. Critics of the bill may argue it adds unnecessary legal risks for responsible gun owners without addressing the root causes of gun violence and accidental discharges. Furthermore, there is a question regarding the effectiveness of such measures in changing behavior compared to ensuring better education and safe practices surrounding firearms and their use in homes.