Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB437

Introduced
1/20/22  
Refer
1/20/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Engrossed
3/18/22  
Refer
3/18/22  

Caption

Criminal Law - False Statements - Public Safety Answering Points and Penalty

Impact

The impact of HB 437 on state law is significant as it introduces stricter regulations regarding false communications to public safety entities. Offenders could face a maximum of three years in prison and/or up to $500 for misdemeanors, and more serious offenses could yield up to five years in prison and fines up to $25,000 for felonies. This aims to deter malicious behaviors that can jeopardize public safety, ensuring that emergency response systems are not unduly burdened by false or disruptive calls.

Summary

House Bill 437 amends Maryland's criminal law to address communications made to public safety answering points that may impair their functioning or disrupt emergency responses. The bill establishes clear definitions, including what constitutes 'course of conduct' and 'data', and sets punitive measures for those who violate these provisions. The penalties include both misdemeanor and felony charges, tailored to the severity of the offense, indicating Maryland's serious stance on maintaining the integrity and efficiency of public safety communications.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 437 has generally been supportive among lawmakers focused on enhancing public safety. Advocates argue that the bill will help to protect emergency resources and ensure that legitimate calls are prioritized. However, there are concerns voiced by civil rights advocates regarding the implications for freedom of speech and potential overreach in penalizing individuals. Nonetheless, the overwhelming voting support in the legislature (130 in favor with no opposition) indicates a strong consensus on the necessity of these measures.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include debates over how to balance the enforcement of this bill with civil liberties. Opponents have suggested that this could lead to disproportionate consequences for minor infractions, particularly concerning how the law defines and penalizes anonymous and repeated communication to emergency services. Discussions highlighted a need for guidelines that would prevent unintended legal repercussions for individuals who may contact public safety services without malicious intent.

Companion Bills

MD SB57

Crossfiled Criminal Law - Public Safety - Communications With Public Safety Answering Points

Previously Filed As

MD SB57

Criminal Law - Public Safety - Communications With Public Safety Answering Points

MD SB83

Criminal Law - Public Safety - Interference with a Public Safety Answering Point - Penalties

MD HB744

Criminal Law - Public Safety - Interference With a Public Safety Answering Point - Penalties

MD SB81

Criminal Law - Interference With a Public Safety Answering Point - Penalties

MD HB70

Criminal Law - Interference With a Public Safety Answering Point - Penalties

MD HB445

Criminal Law - Interference With a Public Safety Answering Point - Penalties

MD SB405

Criminal Law – Public Safety – Interference With a Public Safety Answering Point – Penalties

MD SB496

Criminal Law - Interference With a Public Safety Answering Point - Penalties

MD HB444

Criminal Law – Interference With Critical Infrastructure or a Public Safety Answering Point – Penalties

MD SB340

Criminal Law - False Statements - Emergency or Commission of Crime (Antiswatting Act of 2023)

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.