Kansas House Bill HB2139

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/23/23
• Report Pass: 2/7/23
• Refer: 2/23/23
• Refer: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/20/23
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Creating the crime of abuse of a sports official and providing criminal penalties therefor.

Impact

If enacted, HB2139 will amend the Kansas criminal code to include penalties for those convicted of abusing sports officials. It establishes different levels of misdemeanor charges based on the age of the official, emphasizing the seriousness with which the state views the protection of both youth and adult referees. For instance, if the victim is under 18 years of age, the offense is classified as a class A misdemeanor, highlighting the heightened protections for younger officials. This change is likely to raise awareness surrounding the treatment of sports officials and could influence broader societal norms regarding respect and sportsmanship at competitive events.

Summary

House Bill 2139 addresses the issue of violence and abuse against sports officials by establishing a new crime: abuse of a sports official. This legislation is designed to protect referees, umpires, and other individuals functioning in officiating roles during competitive events. The bill defines abuse broadly, encompassing physical acts such as striking or shoving as well as verbal threats and obscene gestures directed toward sports officials. By categorizing these actions as criminal offenses, the bill aims to deter potential abusers and ensure a safe environment for officials who play a critical role in sporting events.

Contention

The bill may face some contestation, largely related to the implications of criminalizing behavior in the sporting sphere. Some advocates for sportsmanship may argue that existing discipline mechanisms within sports organizations should suffice, without the need for legislative action. Furthermore, discussions might arise about the potential for overreach where reasonable questioning or discussion of officiating decisions could be misconstrued as abuse, raising concerns about stifling open dialogue in competitive settings. Nonetheless, proponents believe the bill is a necessary step toward protecting individuals who often face unruly behavior while performing their duties.