Animals: research facilities; reporting requirements and penalties for noncompliance; provide for. Amends sec. 12 of 1969 PA 224 (MCL 287.392) & adds secs. 11a & 12a. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0149'23
The bill imposes stricter penalties for noncompliance, including administrative fines that vary based on the number of laboratory animals involved in the violation. For instance, fines start at $1,000 for violations involving a single animal and can escalate up to $10,000 for multiple infractions. There are also civil fines for failure to submit the required compliance reports. The establishment of the laboratory animal fund to collect these fines further underscores the state's commitment to improving standards in animal research and treatment.
Senate Bill 148, titled 'An act to license and regulate dealers in and research facilities using dogs and cats for research purposes', seeks to amend existing laws regarding the oversight of research facilities that utilize laboratory animals. The bill introduces new reporting requirements that obligate research facilities to submit annual compliance attestations, ensuring adherence to the established animal welfare regulations. This is intended to strengthen the regulatory framework and provide more systematic oversight in the treatment of laboratory animals used in research.
The sentiment surrounding SB 148 appears to be generally supportive among its proponents, who argue that it represents a necessary step towards enhancing animal welfare and ensuring accountability in research settings. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders regarding the potential impact of increased regulatory burdens on research facilities, especially those smaller or with limited resources.
Notable points of contention include whether the increased reporting requirements and fines may disproportionately affect smaller laboratories or organizations that conduct animal research. While advocates for animal welfare emphasize the need for rigorous enforcement of animal treatment standards, opponents could argue that excessive regulation might hinder necessary research advancements by imposing financial and administrative challenges.