Michigan House Bill HB4169

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/23
• Refer: 3/2/23
• Report Pass: 10/12/23
• Engrossed: 4/30/24
• Refer: 5/1/24
• Report Pass: 12/12/24
• Refer: 12/12/24

Caption

Health occupations: occupational therapists; occupational therapy licensure compact; enact. Amends 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.1101 - 333.25211) by adding sec. 16188.

Impact

If passed, this compact could significantly impact the legal framework surrounding occupational therapy practice in Michigan and participating states. It would streamline procedures for occupational therapists by allowing them to use a single license across member states. This change is expected to enhance service delivery, especially in remote areas and for military families relocating, thus potentially increasing the availability of care and services. The bill also emphasizes the importance of using Telehealth technology to further expand access to occupational therapy services.

Summary

House Bill 4169 proposes the enactment of the Occupational Therapy Licensure Compact, which aims to facilitate the practice of occupational therapy across state lines. The bill intends to improve public access to occupational therapy services by allowing for the mutual recognition of occupational therapy licenses from member states. It underscores the necessity for collaboration among states to regulate the multi-state practice of occupational therapy while retaining the regulatory authority of each state to ensure public safety and health.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 4169 has been mixed among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the compact would serve to remove bureaucratic barriers that currently hinder occupational therapy practice across state boundaries, suggesting that greater access to these services will ultimately benefit patients. However, some critics are wary about the implications it might have on local regulatory control, fearing that it may dilute the standards and practices customized for local communities.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around the balance between state regulatory authority and the benefits of a unified approach to licensure. Opponents express concerns about the potential loss of local standards and community-specific regulations in occupational therapy practice. Additionally, the requirement for member states to comply with the established rules and regulations of the compact raises questions about the flexibility local states may have in addressing unique regional concerns, possibly leading to a one-size-fits-all model.