The modifications proposed by HB 2261 are intended to alleviate the strain on the state's historic preservation division, which often faces extensive review delays impacting the feasibility of housing projects. In its current form, the existing law applies historic preservation requirements broadly to all buildings over fifty years old, potentially stalling redevelopment efforts of many structures with little historical, architectural, or cultural merit. This act is expected to expedite project approvals and, consequently, increase the availability of residential units, addressing a critical housing shortage in the state.
Summary
House Bill 2261 aims to amend existing historic preservation laws in Hawaii by redefining the criteria for what constitutes a 'historic property.' The bill specifically narrows the definition to only include properties that are either listed on the Hawaii or National Register of Historic Places or were built before August 21, 1959. This change is driven by the urgent need to increase the housing supply in Hawaii and reduce the burdensome review process that currently affects many properties merely due to their age. By focusing preservation efforts on properties of true historical significance, HB 2261 aims to streamline the redevelopment of residential properties and facilitate more efficient project approvals.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 2261 is a mix of urgency for increased housing and concerns about the preservation of Hawaii's historical assets. Proponents argue that modernizing the criteria for historic property designation is essential to support housing development and economic growth. However, there are apprehensions from some community members and preservationists who fear that such changes may lead to the loss of valuable historical properties that are not currently recognized but hold cultural significance.
Contention
A notable point of contention within discussions regarding HB 2261 is the balance between development and preservation. While the bill seeks to enhance housing availability, critics argue that narrowing the definition of historic property may undermine efforts to preserve Hawaii's unique heritage. The bill explicitly states that protections for other sites of cultural importance, such as iwi kupuna, remain intact, but discussions continue about the long-term implications of prioritizing development over historic preservation amidst the pressing housing demand.
Proposes amendment to Constitution to require each house of the Legislature to meet four times annually solely to vote on bills that provide property tax relief.
Proposes amendment to Constitution to require each house of the Legislature to meet four times annually solely to vote on bills that provide property tax relief.