Michigan House Bill HB4257

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/9/23
• Refer: 3/9/23

Caption

Crimes: penalties; penalties for parents or guardians who procure gender transition surgeries or irreversible hormonal procedures for children under 18; provide for. Amends sec. 136b of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.136b).

Impact

The legislation intends to fortify child protection mandates by categorizing certain gender transition procedures as unlawful acts. This position seeks to shield minors from decisions deemed irreversible or harmful at such a young age. The bill outlines strict definitions of 'cruelty' and 'harm,' aiming to create a clear demarcation regarding parental responsibilities and medical practices involving children. Parents and guardians risk significant legal repercussions if they are found guilty of violating this law, thereby introducing a chilling effect on decision-making regarding gender identity and health for their children.

Summary

House Bill 4257 proposes significant amendments to the Michigan penal code specifically targeting the provisions related to child abuse. The bill classifies parents or guardians who consent to or directly assist in gender transition procedures for minors under the age of 18 as potentially committing first-degree child abuse. This bill denotes consent to gender affirmation treatment, including surgeries or hormonal treatments, as an act that inflicts serious harm, thereby making it a punishable offense with severe penalties, including life imprisonment or terms of years for first-degree charges.

Contention

The bill is expected to generate considerable debate concerning the rights of parents, youth autonomy, and the role of medical professionals in administering gender-affirming care. Proponents argue that the measure protects vulnerable minors from decisions they may later regret, simultaneously emphasizing the need for stringent oversight in medical procedures affecting gender identity. In contrast, opponents of the bill suggest that it infringes on parental rights and limits access to necessary healthcare. Furthermore, critics express concerns that this legislation may stigmatize and endanger transgender youth who may already face discrimination and challenges in accessing comprehensive medical care.