Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB518

Introduced
2/13/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Engrossed
2/28/23  
Refer
3/13/23  
Enrolled
4/3/23  

Caption

Authorize standing for legislature to bring lawsuit

Impact

The enactment of HB 518 allows the Legislature to take a more active role in litigation related to the enforcement of its statutes. This is particularly significant in cases where state laws are challenged and may not be defended adequately by existing entities. Thus, this bill addresses potential gaps in compliance and execution of legislative duties, reinforcing the Legislature's ability to conduct oversight of the executive branch and uphold the rule of law within the state.

Summary

House Bill 518 provides the Montana Legislature with the statutory authority to sue and defend lawsuits to ensure compliance with legislative enactments. This bill aims to empower the Legislature to intervene in cases where its laws are not being implemented or are challenged in court based on their constitutionality. By granting standing to the Legislature, the bill enhances the institutional capacity of the Legislature to uphold its laws and carry out its obligations in a representative democracy.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 518 appears to be one of support among those who advocate for the Legislature's authority and its responsibilities in governance. Proponents view the bill as a necessary measure to enhance legislative power and accountability. However, there is concern among some critics who believe that expanding the Legislature's ability to sue could lead to overreach and politicization of the judicial system.

Contention

Notable points of contention include fears that HB 518 might allow the Legislature to intervene in lawsuits too broadly, potentially undermining the traditional checks and balances of state governance. Critics argue that granting such standing could lead to the Legislature acting inappropriately in matters typically reserved for the judiciary, while supporters assert that such measures are essential to ensure that legislative intent is upheld and not lost in bureaucratic inaction.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT SB395

Revise legal requirement of standing to maintain a lawsuit

MT HB512

Authorize legislator intervention in lawsuits

MT HB717

Limit lawsuits on environmental actions

MT HB1805

Relating To The Procedure For Payment Under Protest Lawsuits.

MT HB1174

Relating To The Procedure For Payment Under Protest Lawsuits.

MT HB322

Generally revise laws related to standing masters

MT HB584

Revise government lawsuit laws relating to firearms and ammunition

MT HB733

Relative to reporting requirements for persons or entities financing lawsuits.

MT S1732

Authorizes application for dismissal of a "Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation" ("SLAPP").

MT A3132

Authorizes application for dismissal of a "Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation" ("SLAPP").

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon