Utah 2023 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0034

Introduced
1/17/23  
Engrossed
1/17/23  
Refer
1/23/23  
Report Pass
1/26/23  
Enrolled
3/9/23  

Caption

Boards and Commissions Amendments

Impact

The implementation of HB 0034 will directly alter state laws pertaining to the establishment and operation of executive boards. By enforcing consistent reporting and evaluation requirements, the bill will likely lead to the dissolution of boards that no longer serve an essential function or require excessive governmental resources. This is anticipated to streamline government operations and reduce redundancy, potentially saving taxpayer money and increasing government efficiency. Furthermore, it could provide clearer avenues for citizens to engage with and provide feedback about the activities of executive boards, thanks to the proposed online portals for input on board members and decisions.

Summary

House Bill 0034, titled the Boards and Commissions Amendments, aims to enhance accountability and oversight concerning the executive boards within the state government. The bill mandates that the governor must review each newly created executive board within a year of its establishment to determine its effectiveness and necessity. If an executive board fails to meet a five-year reporting requirement, it will be subject to a review for potential repeal by an interim committee. This legislative framework seeks to ensure that executive boards are not only serving a substantial governmental interest but are also necessary for ongoing operations, thereby encouraging efficient use of resources and governmental effectiveness.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 0034 appears generally supportive, particularly among lawmakers advocating for greater governmental efficiency and accountability. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards modernizing state governance and removing outdated or ineffective boards. However, there may be nuanced concerns from individuals who feel that the tightening oversight could disrupt boards that have been serving niche community interests or that are seen as beneficial, despite their limited scope. Overall, the discussion points toward a consensus on the need for oversight, albeit with some apprehension regarding the potential impacts on specific programs.

Contestation

A notable point of contention regarding HB 0034 could arise from differing opinions on what constitutes a 'substantial governmental interest.' Some lawmakers may argue for the preservation of boards that address specific and local issues, while others may focus on efficiency and cost-cutting mandates. The bill also raises questions about the potential for political influence in the governor's evaluations of board necessity, which may lead to further debates on transparency, representation, and the broader goals of state governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT SB0254

Boards and Commissions Amendments

UT HB0412

Boards and Commissions Revisions

UT SB0123

Boards and Commissions Modifications

UT HB0532

State Boards and Commissions Modifications

UT HB0534

Boards and Commissions Modifications

UT HB0072

State Boards and Commissions Amendments

UT HB0494

Boards and Committee Amendments

UT SB0227

Boards and Commissions Revisions

UT SB013

Boards And Commissions

UT HB0066

Behavioral Health Crisis Response Commission Amendments

Similar Bills

KY HB422

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations.

KY SB23

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations and declaring an emergency.

KY HB337

AN ACT relating to legislative committees and declaring an emergency.

KY SB65

AN ACT relating to deficient administrative regulations and declaring an emergency.

OR HB3141

Relating to the Office of Administrative Hearings.

KY HB40

AN ACT relating to administrative regulations and declaring an emergency.

KY HB81

AN ACT relating to governmental accountability and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1065

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund.