Rhode Island House Bill H7031

Rhode Island 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/22
• Refer: 1/10/22

Caption

Joint Resolution To Approve, Publish And Submit To The Electors A Proposition Of Amendment To The Constitution Of The State - Four Year Terms And Term Limits For Representatives And Senators (proposes An Amendment To The State Constitution, Article Iv, To Allow For Term Limits For The General Assembly Members.)

Impact

The proposed amendment aims to address the historical instability associated with shorter legislative terms that can lead to increased turnover and lack of continuity within the legislature. By extending the terms from two to four years, the bill is expected to grant legislators more time to develop policies and initiatives without the pressure of imminent re-election. Importantly, it also introduces limits on the number of consecutive terms individuals can serve, capping them at three four-year terms. This is perceived as a mechanism to foster fresh perspectives in governance while retaining experienced legislators.

Summary

House Bill H7031 proposes a significant amendment to the Rhode Island state constitution, specifically targeting the tenure and election frequency of members of the General Assembly. The bill seeks to replace the current system with a structure that allows for four-year terms for representatives and senators, as well as implementing term limits. This change aims to modernize the terms of office from the existing two-year terms to align with a longer tenure that supporters argue will enable more consistent and progressive legislation over extended periods.

Contention

The debate surrounding H7031 encompasses both support and opposition from varied political factions and public stakeholders. Proponents argue that longer terms can lead to a more effective legislative body that can pursue long-term goals without constant election cycles. However, opponents raise concerns that term limits may prevent experienced legislators from continuing to serve successfully and could inadvertently push out competent lawmakers. They also express apprehension about the potential for a less seasoned legislature if knowledgeable representatives are frequently cycled out, potentially diminishing the quality of governance.

Additional_notes

If passed, the amendment would modify the state constitution, ensuring that the proposed structures, including the recall process for general officers under specific conditions, are clearly defined. The amendment would also establish a formal pathway for voters to engage in the democratic process through recall elections, especially in cases of misconduct or ethical violations.