South Dakota House Bill HB1281

South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/22
• Refer: 2/4/22
• Refer: 2/14/22
• Engrossed: 2/23/22
• Refer: 2/24/22
• Report Pass: 3/2/22
• Enrolled: 3/7/22
• Vetoed: 3/28/22

Caption

Clarify the contents of the general appropriations act for fiscal year 2023, pertaining to certain federal moneys and to declare an emergency.

Impact

The bill establishes several budget units within the state’s departments—like transportation, education, and health—dedicated to managing specific federal funds. This structure promotes accountability and clarity in the use of these funds, ensuring they are spent in accordance with federal guidelines. Additionally, it creates a framework for the Department of Transportation and other agencies to manage the federal funds efficiently, allowing faster response to federal opportunities and enhanced infrastructure development within the state.

Summary

House Bill 1281 is an act designed to clarify the general appropriations act of South Dakota for the fiscal year 2023, specifically regarding certain federal moneys received through acts like the American Rescue Plan and the Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act. This bill aims to ensure that funds provided by these federal initiatives are properly allocated to various state departments and agencies to support their operations and projects. The legislation emphasizes the state's commitment to effectively utilizing federal resources for infrastructure and public services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1281 is generally positive among lawmakers, especially those who advocate for economic development and infrastructural improvements fueled by federal investment. Lawmakers view the bill as a necessary step to ensure that South Dakota can capitalize on federal funding opportunities and improve state services. However, some concerns were raised regarding the potential for misallocation of funds or overreach in how the state interprets federal guidelines.

Contention

Despite its overall support, notable points of contention include debates over how quickly funds can be mobilized and the processes required for oversight of expenditures. Some lawmakers argue for stricter controls and transparency measures, fearing that without careful scrutiny, the significant influx of federal money might lead to inefficiencies or misuse. This highlights an ongoing tension between rapid funding and the need for accountability in public spending.