The legislation seeks to amend existing statutes, specifically Section 205-13 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, to impose maximum fines of $5,000 for first-time violators, which increases significantly for subsequent violations to $20,000 and $30,000. This adjustment is intended to deter landowners from using agricultural properties for unintended purposes and reinforces the state's commitment to preserving agricultural lands for sustainable use and economic stability. The bill ultimately aims to enhance agricultural self-sufficiency and ensure that the objectives of land use laws are met.
Summary
House Bill 2505, which relates to land use, aims to enhance the penalties for violations concerning important agricultural lands in Hawaii. The bill addresses concerns that some landowners and developers have abused the designation of these lands for personal or financial gain, undermining the state's agricultural goals. To combat this misuse, the bill proposes increased fines for violations of land use laws and introduces escalated penalties for repeated infractions involving important agricultural lands.
Sentiment
Sentiment around HB 2505 appears generally supportive among agricultural advocates and lawmakers focused on environmental integrity. Proponents argue that strict penalties are necessary to protect valuable agricultural resources and to promote responsible land management practices. However, concerns exist about the implications of stricter penalties on developers and landowners who may unintentionally violate regulations, which raises questions about fairness and the potential for stifling development in economically viable industries.
Contention
Notable contention arises from the interpretation of what constitutes a violation and the potential for hefty fines to be imposed on landowners who may be unaware of the nuances in agricultural land use regulations. There is also discussion regarding how these penalties might affect future development plans and economic opportunities within communities that rely on flexible use of agricultural lands. Balancing the need for conservation with economic growth remains a critical point of debate surrounding the bill.
Urging The Department Of Agriculture To Establish A Two-year Agricultural Crime Pilot Project To Examine And Assess The Effectiveness Of Prosecuting Agricultural Crime Cases, Including Those Of Agricultural Theft, Vandalism, And Trespass, In The State.
Urging The Department Of Agriculture To Establish A Two-year Agricultural Crime Pilot Project To Examine And Assess The Effectiveness Of Prosecuting Agricultural Crime Cases, Including Those Of Agricultural Theft, Vandalism, And Trespass, In The State.