North Carolina House Bill H535

North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/23
• Refer: 3/30/23
• Report Pass: 4/18/23
• Refer: 4/18/23
• Report Pass: 5/3/23
• Engrossed: 5/4/23
• Refer: 5/4/23

Caption

Solar Capacity Limit Increase

Impact

If enacted, HB 535 would modify current regulations regarding how solar energy facilities are leased and operated within the state. The new provision would empower more individuals to participate in the solar leasing program, enabling them to install solar energy systems that meet their energy demands. This could lead to a rise in solar installations, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable energy practices. It also implies a shift towards encouraging local energy production and minimizing reliance on traditional power sources.

Summary

House Bill 535, titled the Solar Capacity Limit Increase, seeks to significantly raise the rooftop solar leasing cap in North Carolina from 1% to 10% of the average retail peak demand from the last five years. The bill aims to provide more opportunities for solar energy usage among residential and non-residential customers by allowing larger solar installations under leasing agreements. This legislative change reflects a growing emphasis on renewable energy sources and the state’s commitment to increasing solar capacity as part of its energy infrastructure.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding bill H535 appears to be predominantly positive, particularly among proponents of renewable energy who emphasize the need for increased solar capacity to combat climate change and facilitate energy independence. Supporters argue that the bill can stimulate the local economy by creating jobs in the installation and maintenance of solar products. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the pace of change and the implications of increasing capacity limits, raising questions about the management of this growth and its effects on the existing energy market.

Contention

Despite the supportive sentiment, there are notable points of contention regarding HB 535. Critics argue that increasing the solar leasing cap could overwhelm existing utility infrastructure if not properly managed. Additionally, there may be apprehensions from traditional energy providers about how expanded solar capacity could impact energy pricing and reliability. Stakeholders might also express concerns over the adequacy of regulatory frameworks to ensure the quality and safety of an expanding number of solar installations.