South Dakota Senate Bill SB13

South Dakota 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/23
• Refer: 1/10/23
• Report Pass: 1/26/23
• Engrossed: 2/1/23
• Enrolled: 2/6/23
• Passed: 2/24/23

Caption

Authorize the construction of an addition to the BG Dean Mann Readiness Center in Sioux Falls, to make an appropriation therefor, and to declare an emergency.

Impact

The bill directly impacts state law by approving a substantial appropriation for military construction, which could set a precedent for future funding allocations for similar projects. This investment signifies a prioritization of military capabilities and preparedness within state funding mechanisms. The expedited passage of the bill, which includes a declared emergency, suggests an urgent need for the improvements at the readiness center, reflecting a strategic perspective on military readiness.

Summary

Senate Bill 13, titled 'An Act to authorize the construction of an addition to the BG Dean Mann Readiness Center in Sioux Falls', aims to facilitate significant infrastructural enhancements to the state military facilities. The legislation includes an appropriation of $6 million to fund the construction, along with provisions for adjustments based on inflation and regulation compliance. This bill underscores the state's commitment to bolstering its military readiness through improved facilities and infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB13 appears generally supportive, as it is designed to enhance state military readiness. Lawmakers expressed a sense of urgency to pass the bill, highlighting a bipartisan recognition of the importance of maintaining robust military infrastructure. The unanimous support during voting, with no opposing votes recorded, indicates a strong consensus among legislators regarding the necessity and value of the proposed construction.

Contention

Although SB13 was passed without opposition, potential points of contention may arise over the allocation of funds and the prioritization of military spending compared to other state needs. Critics may question if funding infrastructural enhancements for military facilities should be prioritized over social services or educational infrastructure, which could foster future discussions on budget allocations and resource management. Additionally, the flexibility allowed for cost adjustments might raise concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability.