The appropriation authority of the legislature and the allocation of moneys Wisconsin receives from the federal government (second consideration).
Impact
The passage of AJR6 would have significant implications for state governance, particularly in the relationship between the executive and legislative branches. By requiring legislative approval for the allocation of federal moneys, the bill aims to increase legislative oversight and control over state budgeting processes. This could lead to a shift in decision-making dynamics within state government, ultimately impacting how swiftly and efficiently federal resources are deployed in response to needs within the state.
Summary
AJR6 is a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at clarifying the appropriation authority of the Wisconsin legislature concerning federal funds. Currently, the governor has the power to accept and allocate federal money without needing specific legislative approval. This amendment seeks to prohibit the delegation of appropriation powers to the governor, ensuring that any allocation of federal funds must receive joint resolution approval from the legislature. If approved, this shift would fundamentally alter the fiscal landscape of how federal monetary resources are managed within the state.
Contention
Discussions surrounding AJR6 have brought to light various points of contention. Proponents argue that the amendment is essential for maintaining legislative authority over fiscal matters and preventing unilateral decision-making by the governor. However, opponents caution that such a requirement could slow down the allocation of critical funds, especially in emergencies when timely responses are necessary. The debate highlights the balance of power between the legislature and the executive branch, calling into question how best to ensure accountability while still allowing for effective governance.
Prohibiting state and local governments from using privately sourced moneys or equipment in connection with the conduct of elections and specifying who may perform tasks related to the conduct of an election (second consideration).
Prohibiting state and local governments from using privately sourced moneys or equipment in connection with the conduct of elections and specifying who may perform tasks related to the conduct of an election (second consideration).
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the rate of growth of appropriations from all sources of revenue except the federal government and to authorize the legislature to appropriate money for tax rebates.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to limit the rate of growth of appropriations from all sources of revenue except the federal government and to authorize the legislature to appropriate money for tax rebates.
Relating to the authority of the legislature to determine that certain federal directives are unconstitutional and to prohibit certain government officers and employees from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of the directive.