New Hampshire Senate Bill SB127

New Hampshire 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/23
• Refer: 1/19/23
• Report Pass: 2/16/23
• Report Pass: 3/8/23
• Engrossed: 3/21/23
• Refer: 3/21/23
• Report Pass: 5/12/23
• Report DNP: 5/12/23
• Enrolled: 6/21/23
• Chaptered: 7/11/23
• Passed: 7/11/23

Caption

Relative to certain programs administered by the department of health and human services.

Impact

In addition to restructuring the funding for opioid treatment, SB127 modifies the definition of personal care services providers to better align with reimbursement practices from the state. By expanding the potential for reimbursement to legally responsible relatives or guardians who assist eligible consumers with special healthcare needs, the bill attempts to offer more flexibility and support for families caring for disabled or elderly individuals. Furthermore, the bill revises existing reporting requirements and quality assessments in nursing facilities, potentially decreasing the administrative burden on these facilities while maintaining standards for care and service delivery.

Summary

Senate Bill 127 (SB127) seeks to amend various provisions related to programs administered by the Department of Health and Human Services in New Hampshire. The bill primarily focuses on improving the structure and administration of opioid treatment programs by introducing a new fee collection mechanism for methadone providers, channeling these funds into a designated special fund to enhance the effectiveness and administration of such programs. This change aims to bolster the state’s efforts in combating the opioid crisis by ensuring that treatment services are funded adequately and efficiently.

Contention

Discussion around SB127 highlighted both support and concerns among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the adjustments in reimbursement practices for personal care services will facilitate better care for consumers, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is a challenge. Critics, however, express concerns that the bill may inadvertently limit oversight and transparency in care facilities, with implications for service quality. The balance between streamlining processes and maintaining rigorous standards in public health services is a key point of contention surrounding this legislation.