Kansas House Bill HB2422

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/23
• Refer: 2/15/23
• Report Pass: 3/7/23
• Engrossed: 3/16/23
• Refer: 3/17/23
• Report Pass: 3/22/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Senate Substitute for HB 2422 by Committee on Federal and State Affairs - Exempting certain gaming suppliers from the certification requirement of the Kansas expanded lottery act when such suppliers do not contract with the state or the lottery gaming facility manager.

Impact

One of the key features of HB 2422 is the removal of stringent statutory requirements that previously governed the qualifications of the chief inspector. By allowing prospective inspectors to gain qualifications such as a 'B' endorsement or an in-service commission after being appointed, the bill aims to increase flexibility in managing inspector roles. This could potentially lead to a quicker response in filling inspector vacancies, maintaining safety standards regarding boilers and pressure vessels, which are crucial for public safety and compliance in various industries.

Summary

House Bill 2422 focuses on the qualifications and appointment of inspectors concerning boiler safety in the state of Kansas. Specifically, the bill seeks to amend existing laws by eliminating certain statutory qualifications for the position of chief inspector and creating a pathway for deputy inspectors to acquire necessary credentials within specific time frames. This legislative change is intended to streamline the hiring and qualification process for inspectors, ensuring that the state can effectively and efficiently oversee boiler safety without unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles.

Contention

The discussions surrounding HB 2422 suggest a division among stakeholders regarding the implications of loosening these qualifications. Proponents argue that this bill facilitates a more responsive approach to boiler inspections and that it does not compromise safety standards. However, critics raise concerns that this amendment may lead to a dilution of safety regulations, potentially risking public safety if adequately qualified personnel are not maintained. This debate highlights the balancing act between regulatory efficiency and the necessity for strict safety oversight in critical infrastructure sectors.