Exempting certain phone calls from the right to know law.
Impact
The passing of SB 183 would have a significant impact on how emergency call records are handled and disclosed under state law, tightening confidentiality protections concerning 911 call records. This amendment is important for safeguarding the privacy of individuals involved in emergency calls, as it prevents unrestricted public access to potentially sensitive information. Furthermore, allowing access only under specific circumstances could aid law enforcement efforts while balancing the need for privacy rights.
Summary
Senate Bill 183 aims to amend existing laws concerning the privacy and disclosure of records related to New Hampshire's Enhanced 911 system. Specifically, the bill exempts certain records generated under this system from being publicly accessible under the state's Right to Know Law. However, it does establish guidelines for limited disclosure, allowing the relevant information to be shared with law enforcement agencies for investigative purposes, as well as with the caller or the subject of the call, provided there is proper authorization. This is meant to ensure that sensitive information is only used for legal investigation or civil proceedings, which emphasizes the need for lawful handling of potentially sensitive data.
Contention
Discussion surrounding SB 183 may touch on various points of contention, particularly regarding privacy and the balance between public access to information and the need to protect individual rights. Some stakeholders might argue that restricting access to such information could hinder transparency and accountability in state emergency response services. However, proponents assert that the bill is necessary to uphold the confidentiality of sensitive information, especially in legal contexts, safeguarding the rights of both callers and subjects involved in 911 calls.
Extending the position of right-to-know ombudsman for 2 years and exempting individuals who assist in the preparation of a right-to-know complaint at no charge from the unauthorized practice of law.
Adopting the Uniform Commercial Code relative to controllable electronic records, relative to exempting the developer, seller, or facilitator of the exchange of an open blockchain token from certain securities laws and establishing state procurement policies intended to promote the use of American materials.