Relative to an assessment of solid waste facility setback requirements and making an appropriation therefor.
Impact
The bill includes an appropriation of $150,000 to fund the assessment process, indicating a state commitment to improving solid waste management protocols. By modernizing these setback requirements, SB227 aims to create a safer environment for local communities while ensuring that the regulations are technically sound and relevant. The proposed assessment will also involve a public comment period, enhancing transparency and community involvement in environmental governance. Ultimately, the findings may lead to recommendations aimed at refining state law regarding solid waste facilities.
Summary
Senate Bill 227 aims to assess the current setback requirements for solid waste facility permitting in New Hampshire. This assessment will be conducted by the Department of Environmental Services (DES) and is intended to evaluate the environmental, safety, and technical aspects concerning the established setbacks. The bill mandates that a contractor be selected to complete this assessment and report, which should include recommendations for potential adjustments to existing regulations. This initiative reflects a proactive approach towards ensuring that solid waste facilities are safely and effectively managed in relation to surrounding communities.
Sentiment
Overall, sentiment surrounding SB227 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates and community stakeholders who emphasize the importance of safety in solid waste management. However, some concerns may arise regarding the adequacy and effectiveness of the proposed assessment, particularly if stakeholders believe it lacks comprehensive criteria for evaluating potential impacts on public health. The collaborative nature of the public comment process may alleviate some of these concerns by fostering a sense of community inclusion in the decision-making process.
Contention
Notable points of contention that may arise from SB227 could center around the urgency and potential delays in the assessment phase, as well as the implications of any changes that may result from the contractor's recommendations. Stakeholders could express differing opinions on how setback distances should be determined, especially concerning environmental protection versus operational efficiency for waste management facilities. Furthermore, the bill emphasizes the importance of public safety, which could lead to debates over the adequacy of current regulations in protecting community health.
To provide appropriations from the General Fund for the expenses of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Departments of the Commonwealth, the public debt and the public schools for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills incurred and remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; to provide appropriations from special funds and accounts to the Executive and Judicial Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; to provide for the appropriation of Federal funds to the Executive and Judicial Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; and to provide for the additional appropriation of Federal and State funds to the Executive and Legislative Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, and for the payment of bills incurred and remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.