North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S576

Introduced
4/4/23  

Caption

Shared Parenting

Impact

The implications of S576 introduce changes to existing statutes governing child custody arrangements. By mandating consideration for mediation in custody disputes, the bill aims to reduce conflicts between parents and promote agreements that support the child's welfare. Additionally, it outlines a rebuttable presumption that joint custody arrangements are preferable unless significant concerns, such as domestic violence or other safety issues, are present. This approach could alter the dynamics of custody cases significantly, making collaborative solutions more central.

Summary

Senate Bill 576, titled Shared Parenting, establishes a legal presumption in North Carolina favoring joint custody and shared parenting arrangements following a separation or divorce. The bill emphasizes that the best interest of the child is served when both parents are actively involved in their child's life, with the goal that children spend as equal a time as possible with each parent. This legislative approach signals a significant shift towards encouraging cooperative parenting and parental agreements.

Sentiment

The reaction to SB 576 is generally favorable among proponents of shared parenting, who argue that it provides a necessary framework to ensure that children benefit from the involvement of both parents. Supporters believe that this bill will foster healthier family environments post-separation. However, there are concerns from advocates for victims of domestic violence, who fear that the implications of a presumption favoring joint custody could inadvertently place children and vulnerable parents at risk if domestic violence concerns are not adequately acknowledged and addressed.

Contention

Key points of contention around S576 include the adequacy of safeguards for children and parents impacted by domestic violence. Critics argue that while joint custody can be beneficial, the blanket presumption in favor of shared parenting may not take into account unique circumstances that warrant careful judicial consideration. The discussions surrounding this bill illustrate a tension between providing supportive frameworks for cooperative parenting and ensuring that individuals' safety and well-being are prioritized.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NC S162

Shared Parenting

NC H735

Presumption of Shared Parenting

NC HB2296

Shared parenting time; presumption; prohibition

NC SB3284

IMDMA-PARENTING-CHILD SUPPORT

NC H1301

Parenting and Time-sharing of Minor Children

NC H1518

Relative to shared parenting

NC H1710

Relative to shared parenting

NC HB2330

IMDMA-MAINTENANCE/PARENTING

NC HB4277

To modify parenting if father encouraged an abortion

NC HB783

Child custody; require presumption of joint custody and equal parenting time.

Similar Bills

CA AB3182

Housing:governing documents: rental or leasing of separate interests: accessory dwelling units.

CA SB444

Property insurance: insurable interest.

NJ A2746

Creates process for termination of dormant mineral interests.

CA AB319

Mobilehome Parks Act: inspectors: conflict of interest: enforcement actions: sunset.

CA AB534

Common interest developments: mechanics liens.

TX HB834

Relating to reporting ownership of mineral interests severed from the surface estate and the vesting of title by judicial proceeding to certain abandoned mineral interests.

TX HB2261

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.

TX SB738

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.