Michigan House Bill HB4452

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/25/23
• Refer: 4/25/23

Caption

Corrections: prisoners; corrections code of 1953; update to reflect creation of productivity credits. Amends secs. 33, 33c, 34 & 35 of 1953 PA 232 (MCL 791.233 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4450'23

Impact

The amendments in HB4452 would alter existing statutes related to parole by incorporating health assessments into the decision-making process for releasing prisoners. This change could lead to an increase in the number of paroles granted to those with significant health challenges, reducing the burden on the prison system by allowing these individuals the opportunity to receive care outside of prison. Furthermore, the legislation requires that the parole board collaborate with healthcare professionals to evaluate the conditions of prisoners who may qualify for medical parole, thereby ensuring a standard of health prior to parole being granted.

Summary

House Bill 4452 proposes significant amendments to the Corrections Code of 1953, specifically addressing the parole eligibility and conditions for prisoners. The bill aims to introduce provisions for medical parole for prisoners deemed 'medically frail.' This includes stipulations around prisoners’ eligibility for parole based on their health status, allowing for a more compassionate approach for those who are elderly or suffering from severe medical conditions. Additionally, the bill outlines that prisoners who are medically frail may be placed in medical facilities, ensuring that they receive appropriate care post-release.

Contention

While the bill aims to improve the welfare of prisoners, there may be concerns regarding the criteria for determining who qualifies as 'medically frail.' Legislators and stakeholders may argue over the terms of the evaluations and what constitutes sufficient evidence of medical needs. Critics could express apprehension that the bill could potentially lead to a misrepresentation of prisoners' health statuses or an inadequate assessment of their risks upon re-entry into society. As these discussions evolve, the balance between public safety and health rights for prisoners will likely remain a point of contention.