Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session

Washington House Bill HB1369

Introduced
1/17/23  
Refer
1/17/23  
Report Pass
2/9/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Engrossed
3/4/23  
Refer
3/7/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Enrolled
4/18/23  
Chaptered
5/4/23  

Caption

Concerning off-duty employment of fish and wildlife officers.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1369 could have significant implications for the employment practices concerning fish and wildlife officers. Specifically, it aims to provide clear parameters around what constitutes acceptable off-duty employment, thereby preventing potential conflicts of interest or issues related to availability. This clarity is expected to improve operational efficiency within wildlife departments and foster a professional work environment that prioritizes the officers' commitments to state duties.

Summary

House Bill 1369 addresses the off-duty employment of fish and wildlife officers, establishing guidelines and regulations that govern their ability to engage in external employment while not on duty. The bill aims to create a structured approach to off-duty work, ensuring that such employment does not interfere with the officers' primary responsibilities and duties to the state. By clarifying these regulations, the bill intends to enhance the accountability and integrity of fish and wildlife officers in their roles while promoting transparency in their off-duty activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1369 appears largely positive, particularly among proponents who argue that it provides necessary structure to the employment practices of fish and wildlife officers. There is recognition that the bill serves to protect the officers' integrity while accommodating their right to seek additional employment. However, there is also a cautious sentiment concerning the potential for restrictions on the types of off-duty work being permissible, which might raise concerns among the officers themselves regarding personal freedoms and career opportunities.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the specifics of the regulations established by HB 1369. Critics may argue that overly stringent rules could limit the earnings potential and employment opportunities for fish and wildlife officers, which could lead to dissatisfaction within the workforce. Additionally, discussions regarding whether the bill adequately protects the interests of officers while fulfilling public safety concerns may lead to debates about the balance of regulation versus individual freedom in employment practices.

Companion Bills

WA SB5382

Crossfiled Concerning off-duty employment of fish and wildlife officers.

Previously Filed As

WA SB5382

Concerning off-duty employment of fish and wildlife officers.

WA SB5653

Concerning collective bargaining by fish and wildlife officers.

WA SB5728

Concerning fish and wildlife commission members.

WA SB5675

Concerning fish and wildlife commission members.

WA HB1699

Concerning establishing salaries for the Washington fish and wildlife commission.

WA SB5785

Concerning department of fish and wildlife authority with regard to certain nonprofit and volunteer organizations.

WA HB1225

Concerning the permitting for certain department of fish and wildlife hatchery maintenance activities.

WA HB1009

Concerning military spouse employment.

WA SB5085

Concerning principal and assistant principal terms of employment.

WA SB5123

Concerning the employment of individuals who lawfully consume cannabis.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.