South Dakota Senate Bill SB79

South Dakota 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/23
• Refer: 1/20/23
• Refer: 1/31/23
• Report Pass: 2/22/23
• Engrossed: 2/27/23
• Report Pass: 3/1/23

Caption

Make an appropriation to the Department of Game, Fish and Parks to improve and repair infrastructure around Hiddenwood Lake and to declare an emergency.

Impact

If passed, SB79 will not only facilitate necessary repairs and enhancements at Hiddenwood Lake but also bolster the state’s recreational infrastructure, which is crucial for tourism and local economies. The emergency declaration included in the bill reflects a sense of urgency in addressing these infrastructural needs. By providing these funds, the state will be able to enhance facilities that are critical for public use and environmental preservation in this region.

Summary

Senate Bill 79 aims to allocate funds for the improvement and repair of infrastructure around Hiddenwood Lake. The legislation proposes an appropriation of $1 million from the Department of Game, Fish and Parks fund and an additional $1 from the general fund. This bill is introduced with a matching requirement from the grantee, which could total up to $750,000. The bill emphasizes the necessity for infrastructure developments that support recreational activities and enhance the state's natural resources management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB79 appears to be generally supportive among various stakeholders who recognize the importance of maintaining state parks and recreational areas. Supporters argue that such investments are vital for fostering outdoor activities and ensuring safety and accessibility for residents and visitors to Hiddenwood Lake. However, there may be concerns regarding budget allocations, especially in light of other pressing needs within the state budget.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the matching funds requirement, as there may be differing opinions on the feasibility for local entities to meet this condition. Some stakeholders might question whether this matching requirement could inhibit smaller organizations from undertaking necessary improvements. Additionally, discussions may also surface regarding prioritization of funding within the Department of Game, Fish and Parks’ budget, which could impact other projects that also seek state support.