Tennessee House Bill HB0226

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/23
• Refer: 1/21/23
• Refer: 2/6/23
• Chaptered: 3/23/23
• Passed: 3/23/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 43, Chapter 29, relative to the Tennessee corn promotion board.

Impact

The implications of this bill mean a redefinition of how corn production is supported by the state through its promotion board. By amending the pertinent sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, the bill aims to streamline operations associated with the corn promotion board. This can lead to improved marketing strategies and resource allocation for corn producers, fostering economic growth in the agricultural sector. The passage of this bill could further enhance Tennessee's position in the corn production market, benefiting producers and related industries.

Summary

House Bill 0226 seeks to amend certain provisions of the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding the Tennessee corn promotion board. Specifically, the bill proposes to update the governing statutes that outline the functions and structures of this board. The amendments will provide clarity and potentially enhance the board's ability to promote the interests of corn producers within the state. Such enhancements are pivotal, especially in a state like Tennessee where agriculture is a significant part of the economy.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 0226 appears to be supportive, with legislators recognizing the need for updated mechanisms to assist the corn industry. As this bill passed with unanimous support (96-0), it indicates a broad consensus among legislators about the necessity of updates to the promotion board. Stakeholders in the agricultural community are likely to view these changes positively, as they could lead to increased state support for corn-related initiatives.

Contention

While there seems to be general agreement on the bill's intent, a potential point of contention could arise from how these amendments will be implemented and the extent to which they will affect existing practices. Stakeholders may have varying opinions on the best approaches for corn promotion and how state resources should be allocated moving forward. However, the lack of opposition in the voting process suggests that any disputes may be minor or administrative in nature.