Hawaii Senate Bill SCR32

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/24
• Refer: 3/14/24
• Report Pass: 4/3/24
• Engrossed: 4/4/24
• Refer: 4/5/24

Caption

Recognizing The Issue Of Illegal Dumping Within The Waipahu Community And Urging The State, City And County Of Honolulu, And Military To Work Together To Address This Concern.

Impact

Should SCR32 be enacted, it is expected to foster collaboration between state, city, and military authorities to effectively address and mitigate illegal dumping in Waipahu. By calling for joint action from multiple stakeholders, including the military, the resolution seeks to unify efforts towards improved waste management practices in the community. This may lead to the establishment of cleanup initiatives and educational campaigns aimed at increasing awareness and involvement among Waipahu residents regarding responsible waste disposal.

Summary

SCR32 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution acknowledging the pervasive issue of illegal dumping in the Waipahu community of Hawaii. The resolution highlights the environmental dangers posed by illegal dumping, particularly along the West Loch bike path, where debris such as shopping carts obstruct drainage systems. The resolution is driven by concerns expressed by community advocates about the visible impacts of illegal dumping on local public spaces, notably those adjacent to educational institutions, which raises issues regarding public safety and health for both students and residents of the area.

Conclusion

SCR32 serves as a call to action, urging all entities involved to recognize the environmental and social implications of illegal dumping in Waipahu. The resolution aims to instill a sense of accountability among residents and authorities alike, highlighting the need for collective action and sustainable practices in waste management. Its passage could pave the way for significant improvements in both the visual and environmental quality of the community.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding illegal dumping in Waipahu, with advocates arguing for the necessity of urgent action to restore the community's pride and cleanliness. Opposition may arise from differing opinions on resource allocation and the effectiveness of governmental interventions versus community-led initiatives. Environmental advocates insist on the importance of addressing the sources of illegal dumping through education and enforcement, suggesting that merely increasing regulations may not resolve underlying issues.