Relative to controlled and secured storage of printed paper ballots.
The impact of HB1200 on state laws includes a notable shift in the responsibilities regarding ballot security and storage from the Secretary of State's office to the printing companies. By imposing strict criteria on the handling and storage of ballots, the bill aims to bolster public confidence in the electoral process, reflecting a proactive approach to maintaining security throughout the election cycle. Concerns were raised about whether this change might increase costs and complicate existing processes for ballot handling, potentially discouraging some printing companies from participating in state elections.
House Bill 1200 (HB1200) establishes stringent guidelines for the printing, storage, and handling of paper election ballots in New Hampshire. The bill mandates that all printed ballots be stored in a controlled and secured environment to prevent unauthorized access, with limited personnel allowed in storage areas. Further, it requires detailed record-keeping of ballots produced, including the destruction of any misprinted or damaged ballots, which must be certified by an authorized individual as part of the logging process. A 10-day reporting requirement post-election to the Secretary of State regarding the logs and inventory is also stipulated, emphasizing transparency and accountability throughout the electoral process.
Sentiment regarding HB1200 appears mixed. Proponents praise the bill as a necessary step toward enhancing election security and public confidence, viewing the measures as vital in preventing electoral fraud and mismanagement of ballots. Conversely, critics argue that shifting responsibilities to private printing companies may introduce additional overhead costs and logistical challenges that could affect the timely and efficient handling of ballots, ultimately leading to unintended consequences in election administration.
Debate around HB1200 centered on whether the stringent measures outlined in the bill could lead to increased operational costs for printing firms that are contracted to handle state ballots. There are worries that the requirement for a comprehensive video surveillance system coupled with meticulous record-keeping could discourage companies from engaging with the Secretary of State’s office, leading to potential shortages of qualified printers available to fulfill ballot printing needs. Additionally, some stakeholders expressed concern that over-regulating ballot handling might not address existing vulnerabilities effectively.