Hawaii Senate Bill SCR84

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/24
• Refer: 3/14/24
• Report Pass: 4/3/24
• Engrossed: 4/4/24
• Refer: 4/5/24

Caption

Requesting The Department Of Law Enforcement To Convene A Search And Rescue Working Group To Develop And Make Recommendations To Deter Hikers From Entering Illegal Hiking Trails And To Address Rising Search And Rescue Costs Facing The State And Counties Due To Increased Illegal Hiking Traffic.

Impact

The resolution explicitly requests the working group to examine current fines and fees associated with search and rescue operations and propose any necessary changes to enhance public safety and deter illegal hiking. It suggests that implementing financial penalties for individuals who require rescue due to recklessness could foster a sense of responsibility and awareness about the risks of hiking in unsafe areas. By learning from the policies of other states that have similar frameworks, Hawaii seeks to create a legislative environment that prioritizes safety and the protection of its natural resources.

Summary

SCR84 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that calls for the establishment of a Search and Rescue Working Group by the Department of Law Enforcement. The primary aim of this group is to address the increasing issue of individuals entering illegal hiking trails in Hawaii, which not only poses dangers to their safety but also places a significant financial burden on emergency services due to the associated rescue operations. The resolution acknowledges the rise in hiking activities exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to more rescues than ever before and highlighting the urgent need for preventative measures and public accountability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR84 generally seems supportive, focusing on enhancing public safety and reducing costs associated with emergency rescues. However, there may also be concerns regarding the enforcement of fines, particularly relating to the equity and fairness of penalizing individuals in distress, provoking debates on the balance between punishment and ensuring public safety without discouraging outdoor activities.

Contention

Notably, the resolution is positioned at the intersection of public safety and environmental conservation. Controversy may arise concerning the potential overreach of enforcement, with implications that could restrict access to trails based on safety concerns. This could lead to a divide between those advocating for stricter regulations and those who believe in maintaining public access to all hiking routes. The upcoming discussions in the working group will be pivotal in shaping the recommendations that’ll be submitted to the legislature for future legislation.