Montana 2023 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB516

Introduced
3/18/23  
Refer
3/18/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Engrossed
4/4/23  
Refer
4/5/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Enrolled
5/2/23  

Caption

Provide for the Preserving Fertility Act

Impact

This legislation will have a significant impact on state healthcare regulations by requiring insurance providers to cover fertility preservation methods similarly to other necessary medical treatments. Specifically, it requires that policies should not impose higher deductibles or co-pays on fertility preservation services than are typical for other medical interventions. Consequently, this establishes a clearer standard for coverage, improving access for those affected by cancer treatments.

Summary

Senate Bill 516 addresses the need for insurance coverage of fertility preservation services for individuals diagnosed with cancer. Recognizing that certain cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation, can lead to iatrogenic infertility, the bill mandates that insurance policies cover the medically necessary costs associated with standard fertility preservation services. The aim is to ensure that individuals facing cancer treatment have the opportunity to preserve their fertility without the added stress of financial burdens during an already challenging time.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 516 appears to be positive, with strong support from advocates for cancer patients, healthcare providers, and reproductive health specialists. By prioritizing both the mental and physical health of cancer patients, the bill addresses a critical aspect of their overall treatment process. However, concerns may arise about the financial implications for insurance providers and how this may affect premium rates in the long run.

Contention

Whereas proponents celebrate the bill as a step forward in patient rights and healthcare access, opponents may raise issues regarding the potential strain on insurance systems and the feasibility of mandated coverage. Debate may center on the balance between maintaining economic sustainability for insurance providers and ensuring comprehensive care for vulnerable populations. Additionally, discussions could surface over what constitutes 'medically necessary treatment' and how this term is defined in the context of fertility preservation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT H1041

Relative to preserving fertility

MT S598

Relative to preserving fertility

MT A5000

Requires Medicaid coverage for fertility preservation services in cases of iatrogenic infertility caused by medically necessary treatments.

MT S3831

Requires Medicaid coverage for fertility preservation services in cases of iatrogenic infertility caused by medically necessary treatments.

MT HB186

Provides relative to health insurance coverage for standard fertility preservation services (EN INCREASE SG EX See Note)

MT SB172

Health care coverage: fertility preservation.

MT SB335

Health insurance; coverage for fertility preservation treatments.

MT SB954

Fertility preservation treatments; state plan for medical assistance services.

MT SB600

Health care coverage: fertility preservation.

MT SB333

State plan for medical assistance services; fertility preservation treatments, etc.

Similar Bills

MS HB1923

Boat trailers; exempt from highway privilege tax, ad valorem tax and registration and tag requirements.

MT HB99

Revise laws related to motor vehicle laws for clarity and consistency

MT HB670

Notaries not required for vehicle transfers

MT HB165

Notaries not required for vehicle title transfer

IL SB2027

USE/OCC TX-VEHICLES

TX SB87

Relating to the repeal of the driver responsibility program and the vehicle safety inspection program for certain vehicles; imposing replacement fees.

AZ HB2447

TPT; exemption; motor vehicle manufacturers

MT HB341

Revise laws relating to brain injuries