South Dakota 2023 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB142

Introduced
1/26/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Report Pass
2/7/23  
Engrossed
2/13/23  

Caption

Prohibit certain persons from using the title veterinary technician.

Impact

The bill will have a significant impact on the standards of professional practice within the veterinary field in South Dakota. By requiring formal registration and limiting the use of the title only to adequately qualified individuals, it promotes a higher standard of care and accountability among veterinary technicians. Such regulation is expected to enhance public trust in veterinary services, as clients will have confidence that those identifying as veterinary technicians meet established educational and professional criteria.

Summary

Senate Bill 142 aims to regulate the use of the title 'veterinary technician' within South Dakota, ensuring that only individuals who are registered with the State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners can use this title. The bill stipulates that anyone not registered or whose registration is suspended or revoked, may not represent themselves as a veterinary technician, nor can veterinarians falsely advertise an employee as such. Violating this provision is classified as a Class 2 misdemeanor. The enforcement of these regulations is designed to protect the public by ensuring that only qualified individuals possess the title and perform the associated duties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB142 appears positive among advocates of stricter professional regulations in the veterinary field, who view it as a step towards increased professionalism and ethical practice. Supporters argue that the bill will safeguard the integrity of the veterinary profession, although they also acknowledge that implementation will require cooperation and adjustment from current practitioners. Conversely, some may express concerns about the impact on individuals currently working as veterinary technicians who may not meet the future requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the transitional provisions allowing individuals who have extensive practical experience (five years under a supervising veterinarian) to continue using the title until they become registered by July 1, 2025. This provision aims to ease any immediate burden on current unregistered technicians but has raised questions about the adequacy of experience in lieu of formal training. Overall, while the bill seeks to ensure quality and competency in veterinary services, it may face resistance from current practitioners who find the registration requirements challenging.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD SB105

Veterinarians and Veterinary Technicians; licensed veterinarians and veterinary technicians to practice veterinary teleadvice; authorize

SD SB676

Providing veterinarian and veterinary technician reciprocity

SD A784

Requires licensure for veterinary technicians.

SD A2393

Requires licensure for veterinary technicians.

SD HB1097

State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners - Veterinary Technicians and Veterinary Assistants

SD HB1182

To Provide Clarity Regarding The Certification Of A Veterinary Technician Specialist; And To Authorize A Collaborative Practice Agreement Between A Veterinarian And A Veterinary Technician Specialist.

SD HF1037

Veterinary technicians, veterinary assistants, and practice of veterinary technology regulated.

SD HF1228

Veterinary technicians, practice of veterinary technology, and unlicensed veterinary employees regulated.

SD SB1478

Veterinary medicine: registered veterinary technicians.

SD SF1522

Veterinary technicians, the practice of veterinary technology and unlicensed veterinary employees regulation

Similar Bills

CA AB2133

Veterinary medicine: registered veterinary technicians.

CO HB1047

Veterinary Technician Scope of Practice

CA AB516

Registered veterinary technicians and veterinary assistants: scope of practice.

AR HB1182

To Provide Clarity Regarding The Certification Of A Veterinary Technician Specialist; And To Authorize A Collaborative Practice Agreement Between A Veterinarian And A Veterinary Technician Specialist.

NJ A2393

Requires licensure for veterinary technicians.

NJ A784

Requires licensure for veterinary technicians.

IA HF434

A bill for an act providing for veterinary medicine, including the care of animals under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian, providing penalties, and including effective date provisions.

CA SB669

Veterinarians: veterinarian-client-patient relationship.