New Hampshire House Bill HB1079

New Hampshire 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/28/23
• Refer: 11/28/23
• Report Pass: 3/19/24
• Engrossed: 4/2/24
• Refer: 4/2/24
• Report Pass: 5/16/24
• Enrolled: 7/23/24
• Chaptered: 8/7/24
• Passed: 8/7/24

Caption

Relative to critical incident stress management team members and establishing a rural and underserved area educator incentive program for higher education and making an appropriation therefor.

Impact

The second critical component of HB 1079 is the establishment of a Rural and Underserved Area Educator Incentive Program, which provides financial assistance to educators working in specific geographic areas identified as underserved. This program grants loan repayment assistance over a four-year period, incentivizing educators to remain in their positions and support the education of students in less populated regions. The funding mechanism for this program includes an appropriation that is nonlapsing, allowing for sustained support to educators long-term.

Summary

House Bill 1079 addresses significant issues surrounding critical incident stress management and seeks to support educators in rural and underserved areas. The bill primarily modifies the membership and operations of critical incident stress management teams, which are designed to provide support for emergency response and public safety workers who encounter traumatic events. By redefining terms and providing a clearer framework, the bill aims to enhance the effectiveness of these teams and ensure they are adequately trained to assist personnel coping with emotional and psychological stressors.

Contention

Points of contention surrounding HB 1079 focus on the adequacy of the proposed funding and the potential effectiveness of the educator incentive program in addressing teacher shortages in rural areas. Critics have raised concerns about whether the financial incentives provided will be sufficient to attract and retain educators in these challenging environments. Furthermore, discussions have emerged regarding how well the critical incident stress management provisions will operate in practice, including questions about training standards and the overall efficacy of support networks for emergency responders dealing with trauma.