Kansas House Bill HB2572

Kansas 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/24
• Refer: 1/23/24
• Failed: 4/30/24

Caption

Imposing personal delivery restrictions on individuals delivering advance voting ballots on behalf of other voters.

Impact

The bill amends existing statutes to impose stricter controls on how advance voting ballots can be submitted and who can assist voters in this process. By requiring photo identification of individuals delivering ballots, the legislation is intended to reduce potential voter fraud. However, it also introduces complexities for voters who may rely on assistance—especially those with disabilities or language barriers—due to the new requirements for written designations and accompanying personal identification. Each instance of assistance will need documented verification to ensure proper anti-fraud measures are adhered to.

Summary

House Bill 2572 introduces significant regulations concerning advance voting procedures in Kansas. The key provisions necessitate that any individual delivering advance voting ballots on behalf of others must provide a personal delivery accompanied by photographic identification. Furthermore, it demands that the individual delivering the ballot must be recorded by election officials. This aims to enhance the security and traceability of advance voting, in light of concerns regarding ballot tampering and local election integrity.

Citation

The legislative changes encapsulated in HB2572 not only alter the pre-existing laws but also establish a framework intended to promote election security while grappling with the balance of voter access and integrity.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB2572 involve its implications for voter accessibility. Opponents argue that the identification requirements and stringent rules about who can assist voters may disenfranchise individuals with disabilities or those who may not have reliable means to prove their identification. Additionally, there exists concern that the law's enforcement might inadvertently complicate the voting process for those needing assistance, potentially leading to fewer ballots being cast amid administrative hurdles. Proponents maintain that these measures are vital for maintaining the integrity of the election process.