Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB869

Introduced
2/7/22  
Refer
2/7/22  
Report Pass
3/21/22  
Engrossed
3/21/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Enrolled
4/9/22  
Chaptered
5/16/22  

Caption

Wetlands and Waterways Program Division - Permitting for Ecological Restoration Projects - Required Study

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws is significant, as it calls for a distinct and expedited review process for ecological restoration applications separate from development projects. The Wetlands and Waterways Program Division is required to consider the broader ecological benefits of restoration in its permitting process, particularly focusing on the reduction of pollutants and improvement of aquatic environments. This change aims to align Maryland's restoration efforts with its Chesapeake Bay restoration goals and improve community engagement in the permitting process.

Summary

House Bill 869 mandates the Maryland Department of the Environment's Wetlands and Waterways Program Division to establish a specific permitting process for ecological restoration projects. This bill requires a comprehensive study to evaluate the existing permitting statutes and processes, as well as to gather input from various stakeholders, including representatives from the ecological restoration industry and community advocacy organizations. The findings from this study will inform not only a new permitting process but also broader legislative recommendations aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of ecological restoration within the state.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 869 appears supportive, as it reflects a growing recognition of the importance of ecological restoration. Stakeholders, particularly environmental advocates, have expressed enthusiasm regarding the potential for enhanced environmental protections and streamlined processes that would ultimately facilitate restoration efforts. However, there may be reservations among some industry representatives regarding the regulatory burdens that new processes could impose.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the balance between regulatory oversight and project feasibility. While the intent is to establish a rigorous scientific basis for approving restoration projects, some may argue that it could complicate timelines and increase costs associated with project approvals. Additionally, the required stakeholder consultations could lead to differing opinions on the definition of ecological restoration and what constitutes appropriate watershed-based interventions.

Companion Bills

MD SB945

Crossfiled Wetlands and Waterways Program Division - Permitting for Ecological Restoration Projects - Required Study

Previously Filed As

MD SB945

Wetlands and Waterways Program Division - Permitting for Ecological Restoration Projects - Required Study

MD HB1284

Wetlands and Waterways Program - Stream Restoration Projects

MD HB942

Wetlands and Waterways Program - Authorizations for Stream Restoration Projects

MD S557

Accelerating wetlands restoration projects

MD H1052

Accelerating wetlands restoration

MD S866

Wetlands Protection and Restoration Act

MD S555

Wetlands Protection and Restoration Act

MD H845

Establishing an ecologically-based mosquito management program in the Commonwealth to protect public health

MD S445

Establishing an ecologically-based mosquito management program in the Commonwealth to protect public health

MD SB798

Stream Restoration Contractors Licensing Board, Stream Restoration Contractors, and Stream Restoration Project Requirements

Similar Bills

HI HB536

Relating To Freshwater Waterways.

CA AB748

California Abandoned and Derelict Commercial Vessel Program.

OR SB74

Relating to determinations of navigability on Oregon waterways.

IL HB3191

MOTOR FUEL-WATERWAYS

NJ S168

Establishes special dredging account; directs $5,000,000 of sales tax collected annually be deposited therein; directs DEP to administer account and dredging program with certain requirements.

NJ A1721

Establishes special dredging account; directs $5,000,000 of sales tax collected annually be deposited therein; directs DEP to administer account and dredging program with certain requirements.

NJ S1889

Establishes special dredging account; directs $5,000,000 of sales tax collected annually be deposited therein; directs DEP to administer account and dredging program with certain requirements.

NJ A695

Establishes special dredging account; directs $5,000,000 of sales tax collected annually be deposited therein; directs DEP to administer account and dredging program with certain requirements.