Vermont House Bill HCR138

Vermont 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/24
• Engrossed: 1/19/24
• Passed: 1/19/24

Caption

House concurrent resolution commemorating the centennial of the Vermont State Parks

Impact

The resolution highlights the contributions that Vermont State Parks make to the state's economy, noting that they are a significant component of Vermont's $1.9 billion outdoor economy. By showcasing the benefits of outdoor recreation and the parks, the resolution aims to foster greater appreciation and support for these lands, which are sustained through the efforts of state employees and private organizations such as Vermont Parks Forever.

Summary

HCR138 is a House concurrent resolution commemorating the centennial of the Vermont State Parks, a crucial element in the state’s landscape and recreation offerings. It emphasizes the historical significance of the parks, tracing back to their inception in 1924 with the donation that led to the formation of Mt. Philo State Park. This resolution celebrates not only the parks’ aesthetic and historic value but also acknowledges their role in promoting outdoor activities for Vermonters and visitors alike.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR138 is generally positive, reflecting enthusiasm for the preservation and promotion of Vermont's natural resources. Supporters of the resolution, which has a broad sponsorship from various Representatives, emphasize the importance of state parks for community well-being and outdoor enjoyment. The celebration of this centennial serves as a reminder of the value of collaborative efforts in maintaining and enhancing the state’s natural heritage.

Contention

Although the resolution is largely celebratory, it also opens a dialogue about ongoing challenges related to funding and maintaining these parks. As the outdoor recreation sector faces increasing pressure from tourism and environmental factors, the resolution implicitly calls for a commitment to support state parks better. Any contention may arise if discussions about funding prioritize other state projects over park maintenance, a potential concern for outdoor advocates in the future.