Utah 2023 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0400

Introduced
2/7/23  
Refer
2/10/23  
Report Pass
2/14/23  
Engrossed
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Enrolled
3/9/23  

Caption

School Absenteeism Amendments

Impact

The provisions of HB 400 require the State Board of Education to adopt rules that set expectations for local school boards and charter school governing bodies to develop and enforce attendance policies reflecting the unique needs of individual school districts. The bill also enhances the responsibilities of the Division of Juvenile Justice and Youth Services, mandating that they provide evidence-informed programs focusing on prevention and recovery to reduce the risk of students entering the juvenile justice system due to school absences. This shift in policy is expected to have a positive effect on state laws relating to student behavior and education management.

Summary

House Bill 400, known as the School Absenteeism Amendments, focuses on addressing chronic absenteeism in schools by implementing evidence-based strategies to support students. The bill establishes new requirements for local education agencies (LEAs), mandating them to include targeted interventions designed to improve attendance and academic achievement among students. These interventions encompass various activities, including mentorship programs and academic support mechanisms. The bill aims to create a framework for LEAs to engage effectively with students who are struggling with attendance issues and to promote a supportive learning environment.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 400 is supportive, but it also highlights the existing challenges in addressing absenteeism. Advocates argue that the implementation of these evidence-based strategies will lead to a significant reduction in chronic absenteeism and improve educational outcomes. However, some critics express concerns about the adequacy of funding and resources necessary for LEAs to effectively carry out these new policies, questioning whether the mandates imposed by the bill could result in complications for under-resourced schools.

Contention

Despite the positive outlook, the bill does face some contention regarding the implementation of its requirements. Opponents argue that it places additional burdens on LEAs that may already be struggling with funding and resources. There are also concerns about the consistency of interventions and ensuring that the approaches adopted are effective for diverse student populations. The bill's passage indicates a shift towards a more data-driven approach to education management, yet discussions about the implications of such mandates continue to raise important dialogues among educational stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT SB0177

Absenteeism Prevention Amendments

UT HB0399

School Attendance Amendments

UT SB0282

Absenteeism and school attendance.

UT HB0415

School Fees Amendments

UT SB0166

Education Entity Amendments

UT HB0211

School Fees Amendments

UT HB0175

School Fees Amendments

UT SB0482

Absenteeism and student discipline.

UT HB05357

An Act Concerning Chronic Absenteeism.

UT SB01058

An Act Concerning Chronic Absenteeism.

Similar Bills

CA AB216

School safety: Pupil and Staff Safety Pilot Program.

KS HB2669

Codifying the mental health intervention team program administered by the Kansas department for aging and disability services in state statute.

KS HB2236

Establishing the mental health intervention team program in the Kansas department for aging and disability services in state statute and providing incentives for coordination between school districts, qualified schools and mental health intervention team providers.

MS SB2167

Early Intervention Task Force; establish.

MS HB534

Drug Intervention Courts; standardize references.

MS HB623

Drug Intervention Courts; standardize references.

CA AB1975

Medi-Cal: medically supportive food and nutrition interventions.

IL HB3284

VIOLENCE INTERVEN TASK FORCE