The implications of HB 929 extend to how the state handles impeachment, an area that is generally framed within the context of legislative oversight. By organizing a dedicated committee, the bill aims to address potential deficiencies in the current statutory framework for impeachment proceedings in Montana. This could lead to more structured procedures and a clearer understanding of legislative powers concerning impeachment, with potential impacts on state governance and legislative accountability.
Summary
House Bill 929 establishes an interim select committee tasked with studying the impeachment process within the state legislature. The committee's primary responsibilities include evaluating the current impeachment processes, conducting fiscal analyses associated with impeachment proceedings, and proposing legislative reforms for the upcoming session. The select committee will consist of members from both the House and Senate and will report its findings back to the legislature.
Contention
During discussions regarding HB 929, some legislators raised concerns over the committee's composition and the potential for partisan bias in evaluating the impeachment process. Critics argue that an overly politicized committee could compromise the integrity of recommendations made to the legislature. Additionally, the allocation of funds for the committee's activities prompted debate regarding the appropriateness of using state resources for the purpose of reviewing and potentially changing the legislature's own process.
Relating to the impeachment or removal from office of certain public officers, including procedures governing the impeachment, trial on impeachment, and disqualification of state officers, and to the grounds for which certain public officers may be removed from office.
Relating to the impeachment or removal from office of certain public officers, including procedures governing the impeachment, trial on impeachment, and disqualification of state officers, and to the grounds for which certain public officers may be removed from office.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.