Kentucky House Bill HB127

Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/23
• Refer: 1/5/23
• Refer: 2/23/23

Caption

AN ACT relating to paramedic education and making an appropriation therefor.

Impact

By providing scholarships tied to service in coal-producing areas, HB 127 seeks to bolster the workforce of paramedics in regions that commonly face shortages. The funding for the scholarships will primarily stem from coal severance tax revenues, ensuring that the program is funded while also invoking a sense of community service among recipients. This measure reflects a targeted approach to not only train paramedics but also ensure they remain within these communities, hopefully improving local healthcare outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 127 is designed to establish the Coal County Paramedic Scholarship Program aimed at providing financial assistance to eligible students in coal-producing counties of Kentucky. The program incentivizes students to pursue paramedic education by covering their tuition costs, with the stipulation that they must work in a coal-producing county as licensed paramedics for four years after completing their training. This initiative aims to address the critical need for paramedics in these regions, where healthcare access may be limited due to various socioeconomic factors.

Sentiment

The general sentiment toward HB 127 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators and community leaders who see the potential benefits for both the healthcare system and local communities in coal-producing areas. Proponents argue that the bill fosters economic development within these counties and fulfills a critical need for emergency medical services. However, there may be some contention regarding the reliance on coal severance tax, considering the declining coal industry and its environmental implications.

Contention

Notably, there may be debates around the sustainability of the funding model imposed by utilizing coal severance taxes, especially as the state considers its long-term energy and economic strategies. Critics may also argue about the bill's implications for other funding priorities within the education system or public health services. Overall, while the program aligns well with community needs, the discussion about its funding and sustainability is likely to remain a focal point.