If enacted, HB 409 would amend the State Rules Act significantly, impacting how rules are formulated and adopted. The bill mandates that no rule shall be valid or enforceable unless the agency proposing the rule has submitted it alongside the requisite economic impact study to the legislative council service. This change is designed to encourage a more thorough evaluation of potential regulations before they can alter existing state laws or impose new requirements on businesses and citizens.
Summary
House Bill 409, introduced by Randall T. Pettigrew, aims to enhance the oversight of state agency regulations by establishing a framework for legislative review of rules adopted by various state agencies, boards, and commissions. A key provision of the bill requires agencies to conduct an economic impact study prior to any rule being submitted for public hearing. This study is intended to assess the costs, benefits, and overall implications of the proposed rule on municipalities, business sectors, and affected entities, ensuring transparency and accountability in the rulemaking process.
Contention
There are notable points of contention surrounding HB 409, primarily centered on concerns that this additional layer of scrutiny might slow down the rulemaking process. Supporters argue that it will protect the interests of the public and businesses by ensuring that new rules are necessary and reasonable. Conversely, opponents caution that the economic impact requirements could hinder timely regulatory updates essential for public health and safety, or for responding to emerging issues. The tension lies in balancing the need for oversight with the need for responsive governance.
Next_steps
The next steps following the introduction of HB 409 will likely include discussions and potential amendments in legislative committee sessions, where its effectiveness and potential repercussions can be deliberated further. Stakeholders, including industry representatives and advocacy groups, may also rally support or opposition during hearings, seeking to influence the final shape of this legislation before it proceeds to a vote.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.