Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3028

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/16/23  
Report Pass
4/5/23  
Engrossed
4/13/23  
Refer
4/17/23  
Report Pass
6/15/23  
Enrolled
6/21/23  
Passed
7/18/23  
Chaptered
7/26/23  

Caption

Relating to employment protections; and prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The introduction of HB 3028 is expected to impact state laws regarding employee rights and employer obligations. By formalizing the protections for employees engaging in public service roles, the bill strengthens the framework of employment law in Oregon, particularly in fostering civic participation. It empowers employees to take on roles in public life without compromising their employment, thus promoting a more engaged and responsible citizenry. The enforcement mechanism includes a complaint process through the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries, providing a clear pathway for employees to report violations.

Summary

House Bill 3028, relating to employment protections, introduces significant changes intended to safeguard employees serving on state boards or commissions in Oregon. The bill makes it unlawful for employers to discharge, threaten to discharge, intimidate, or coerce employees due to their service on such boards. Specifically, it mandates that employers cannot require employees to use their vacation or sick leave during their time spent in this service, instead allowing for unpaid leave as necessary. This measure is aimed at ensuring that individuals can fulfill these civic duties without the fear of job loss or financial penalty.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 3028 appears to be positive among supporters, who see it as a necessary step toward promoting civic engagement and protecting worker rights. Advocates argue that the bill encourages public service, which is vital for a healthy democracy. However, there are concerns from some employers regarding the implications of added leave requirements, suggesting that it could lead to operational challenges in managing staff availability. Despite these concerns, the general support for the bill reflects a recognition of the importance of facilitating employee participation in state governance and oversight.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include the potential financial burden on employers, particularly smaller businesses, who may find it difficult to manage unpaid leaves and the absence of employees without prior notice. Critics may argue that while the intentions are commendable, the practical implications of enforcing such policies need careful consideration. Furthermore, there could be debates about the balance of responsibilities between civic duty and employment obligations, with differing perspectives on how best to support both.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR HB3187

Relating to age-based employment discrimination; and prescribing an effective date.

OR SB69

Relating to laws concerning job-protected leave from work; and prescribing an effective date.

OR HB2138

Relating to optionally provided employment benefits; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB2888

Relating to required employment leave for the performance of legislative duties; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB2236

Relating to employment; and prescribing an effective date.

OR SB205

Relating to detection of fraud; and prescribing an effective date.

OR HB3021

Relating to laws administered by the Employment Department; and prescribing an effective date.

OR HB4034

Relating to connection to federal tax law; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB1052

Relating to employment; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB3563

Relating to youth workforce development programs; and prescribing an effective date.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.