Wisconsin Senate Bill SB278

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/23
• Refer: 5/15/23
• Report Pass: 9/11/23
• Refer: 10/16/23
• Engrossed: 10/17/23
• Refer: 10/19/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Aids to counties and municipalities for certain special election costs and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The implementation of SB278 is poised to have a significant impact on local election financing. By providing state funds to cover crucial expenses incurred during special elections, the bill aims to alleviate financial burdens on local governments. This support may encourage more efficient electoral processes and ensure that counties and municipalities are adequately equipped to manage special elections without straining their budgets. However, it remains essential for the Wisconsin Elections Commission to enforce guidelines that determine the reasonableness of claimed costs.

Summary

Senate Bill 278 establishes a mechanism for the state of Wisconsin to reimburse counties and municipalities for specific costs associated with the administration of special primaries and elections for state offices. The bill introduces new statutes that clarify which expenses are eligible for reimbursement, ensuring they are reasonable and within customary rates for similar electoral events. Eligible costs include expenses for polling place rentals, election official wages, required election notices, and the production of ballots and voting materials.

Contention

Discussions surrounding SB278 have highlighted potential points of contention, particularly regarding the criteria set forth for reimbursement eligibility. While supporters of the bill argue it enhances election administration and eases fiscal pressure on local governments, critics may raise concerns about the state's oversight of local electoral processes. Furthermore, the bill specifies that reimbursable costs must not exceed customary rates, potentially introducing disputes over what constitutes a 'reasonable' expense in electoral administration contexts. These factors could lead to ongoing dialogues on the responsibilities of local versus state governments in managing election-related expenditures.