Relative to land in current use and relative to magistrates, bail commissioners, the standards applicable to and the administration of bail, and making appropriations.
The passage of SB504 will have significant implications for state laws regarding land use and public access. By enabling landowners to post no-trespass signs while still providing public access for specific recreational activities, the bill attempts to strike a balance between landowner rights and community recreational opportunities. Additionally, the bill addresses issues of criminal trespass by expanding the definitions under existing laws, making it a violation to disregard land use restrictions posted by landowners. This change may necessitate adjustments in enforcement strategies and public awareness campaigns about the new regulations.
Senate Bill 504 (SB504) seeks to amend current laws regarding land designated for public recreation in New Hampshire. Specifically, the bill allows landowners who designate their land as open space for public recreational use to post restrictions on land access, effectively allowing them to limit any activities not specifically permitted. These activities include skiing, snowshoeing, fishing, hunting, and nature observation. This provision aims to encourage landowners to open their land for public enjoyment while providing them with some liability protections against personal injury and property damage when individuals use the land for the designated activities.
While the bill has garnered support for promoting open space and recreational activities, it has also faced criticism. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential overreach in limiting public access and the implications for wildlife and environmental conservation efforts. Opponents argue that while landowners should be able to control access to their properties, excessive restrictions could undermine public rights and diminish the presumption of access to natural spaces. This debate reflects broader tensions between private landownership and public interest in the state’s recreational infrastructure.