Wisconsin Senate Bill SB338

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/15/23
• Refer: 6/15/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Ratification of the agreement negotiated between the University of Wisconsin–Madison and the Wisconsin State Building Trades Negotiating Committee, for the 2022-23 fiscal year, covering employees in the building trades crafts collective bargaining unit, and authorizing an expenditure of funds. (FE)

Impact

The bill has implications for state laws surrounding employment relations and collective bargaining in Wisconsin. By ratifying this agreement, the state legislature underscores the importance of negotiated contracts between state institutions and employee groups. This action may influence future negotiations between the state and various labor unions, as it sets a precedent for how such agreements are ratified in the future. Moreover, it affirms the legal framework established under the State Employment Labor Relations Act, ensuring that employees have a voice in their working conditions and compensation.

Summary

Senate Bill 338 pertains to the ratification of a collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Wisconsin State Building Trades Negotiating Committee for the fiscal year 2022-23. This bill authorizes the necessary expenditure of funds to implement the terms agreed upon by both parties, reflecting legislative approval of the negotiated terms. It is a significant step in recognizing the rights of the collective bargaining unit representing the state's building trades employees, reaffirming the commitment to labor agreements within the public sector.

Contention

While SB338 appears to have broad support, potential points of contention may arise from differing perspectives on labor rights and state spending. Some stakeholders may argue that there is a need for additional scrutiny regarding how public funds are allocated to support these agreements. Opposition may also stem from concerns about the implications for future negotiations and the balance of power between labor unions and the state, particularly in times of budget constraints. Nevertheless, the successful ratification of this contract by the legislature reflects a collective willingness to support labor agreements in a meaningful way.