Maryland House Bill HB1046

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/22
• Refer: 2/10/22

Caption

Criminal Procedure - Facial Recognition Technology - Requirements, Procedures, and Prohibitions

Impact

The enactment of HB 1046 will significantly impact state law by establishing a regulatory framework around the use of facial recognition technology in criminal investigations. By instituting requirements for verification and independent oversight, the bill aims to mitigate concerns regarding potential misuse and the reliability of such technology. The bill emphasizes the importance of protecting individual rights while still allowing law enforcement the necessary tools to conduct effective investigations. Overall, this act seeks to create a balance between technological advancement in law enforcement and the safeguarding of civil liberties.

Summary

House Bill 1046 primarily addresses the use of facial recognition technology by law enforcement agencies in Maryland. The bill outlines strict requirements and procedures that must be followed when utilizing such technology. It prohibits the introduction of results generated by facial recognition technology as evidence in criminal proceedings unless these results are independently verified and supported by other evidence. Additionally, the bill aims to enhance transparency and accountability by requiring law enforcement agencies to submit annual reports detailing their use of facial recognition technology, including the number of searches, possible matches, and any data breaches.

Contention

While supporters of the bill argue that it is essential for ensuring ethical use of facial recognition technology, critics raise concerns about potential limitations it may impose on law enforcement capabilities. Some stakeholders advocate that overly restrictive measures could hinder law enforcement efforts, particularly in addressing serious crimes. Furthermore, there is apprehension regarding the effectiveness of facial recognition technology itself and its implications on privacy rights, highlighting the ongoing debates about technological oversight, civil liberties, and public safety.