Michigan House Bill HB4811

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/15/23
• Refer: 6/15/23

Caption

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; certain references in the public safety officers benefit act; make gender neutral. Amends sec. 2 of 2004 PA 46 (MCL 28.632). TIE BAR WITH: HJR F'23

Impact

If enacted, HB 4811 will amend specific sections of the Public Safety Officers Benefit Act, contributing to a cultural shift in how benefits and compensations are framed legislatively. This change could encourage more individuals, regardless of gender, to consider careers in public safety, potentially impacting recruitment and retention within these fields. Additionally, by clarifying definitions and terms related to benefits eligibility, the bill may streamline processes for surviving spouses and dependents of deceased public safety officers, thus enhancing support for these communities.

Summary

House Bill 4811 proposes amendments to the Public Safety Officers Benefit Act (2004 PA 46), specifically targeting the language used in the act. The bill aims to make references within the act gender-neutral, ensuring inclusivity for all public safety officers regardless of gender. This change reflects a growing trend in legislation to remove gendered language to better represent the diversity among public safety personnel, including police officers, firefighters, and EMTs. The move for gender-neutral language is seen as a step towards equality and recognition of all individuals serving in these critical roles.

Contention

During discussions on HB 4811, some legislators expressed concerns about the necessity of these amendments, questioning whether the current language was sufficient and whether the changes would incur additional administrative burdens. Advocates for the bill, however, argue that the benefits of adopting gender-neutral language exceed minor adjustments in language use, as they reflect a broader commitment to equality and modernization in state statutes. The passage of this bill could set a precedent for future legislation in Michigan regarding inclusivity and equal representation.