The inclusion of provisions for both permanent and per diem employees aims to enhance the operational efficiency of the Senate. This could lead to a more streamlined legislative process as adequate staffing is essential for managing the legislative workload effectively. The resolution authorizes the Clerk of the Senate, with approval from the presiding officer, to manage and determine compensation, which offers a degree of administrative autonomy that can adapt to the needs of ongoing legislative sessions.
Summary
Senate Resolution 3, introduced by Senator Tarr on January 12, 2022, focuses on the authorization of appointments for permanent and per diem staff members during the Second Regular Session of the Eighty-Fifth Legislature. The resolution delineates specific positions that can be appointed, including Class I and II administrative assistants, legislative analysts, legal counselors, and various support roles, such as proofreaders and custodians. It also sets forth the pay rates for these positions, allowing for flexibility depending on the role and the discretion of the presiding officer of the Senate for additional staff needs.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding SR3 appears to be one of support from those who see the need for adequate staffing in legislative sessions. The bill does not seem to have substantial opposition, likely due to its administrative nature rather than any contentious policy implications. Most discussion may center on the necessity of proper support for legislative functions, which is typically viewed favorably across party lines.
Contention
While the resolution is fundamentally about staffing and compensation, potential points of contention could arise regarding budgetary implications and the overall cost of such staffing. Critics may question the wisdom of increasing costs associated with legislative staffing, especially in times of fiscal restraint. Additionally, the discretion granted to the presiding officer in appointing staff and determining salaries could lead to concerns about favoritism or lack of transparency in the staffing process.