Tennessee Senate Bill SB0464

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/23
• Engrossed: 3/13/23
• Enrolled: 4/5/23
• Passed: 4/24/23
• Chaptered: 5/3/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 11, Chapter 13; Title 64, Chapter 1, Part 6 and Title 68, Chapter 211, relative to scenic rivers.

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to facilitate the construction and operation of sewer treatment facilities and water treatment facilities in designated scenic river areas. This allows local governments and utilities to engage in projects that are crucial for enhancing infrastructure linked to water supply while also adhering to environmental standards set forth by the Department of Environment and Conservation. By enabling these projects, SB 464 aims to balance ecological integrity with public utility needs in specific river catchment areas.

Summary

Senate Bill 464, aimed at amending various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically focuses on the management of scenic rivers in Tennessee. It designates a segment of the Duck River as a Class II Pastoral River Area, which incorporates new provisions for municipalities and public utilities regarding water treatment and harvesting projects within this watershed. Such amendments may streamline efforts for improving environmental conditions while addressing the water supply needs in certain areas, promoting better resource management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 464 appears to be generally positive among its supporters, who argue that it is a progressive step towards enhancing water management and public health in Tennessee. There is, however, an awareness of potential concerns regarding environmental impacts from increased infrastructure near protected river segments. Supporters advocate that implementing stricter guidelines and regulations can mitigate such impacts while still benefiting the community through improved water resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention stem from the balance between development needs and environmental preservation. Critics may argue that while the bill seeks to improve water management, it could inadvertently lead to greater environmental risks by allowing more utility projects in sensitive river habitats without adequate oversight. The discussion around the bill highlights the conflict between infrastructure development and the prioritization of ecological standards, sparking debates on whether existing regulations sufficely protect Tennessee's scenic rivers.