Kentucky 2023 Regular Session

Kentucky House Bill HB329

Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/15/23  
Refer
2/24/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Engrossed
3/8/23  
Refer
3/8/23  
Refer
3/10/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Enrolled
3/16/23  
Enrolled
3/16/23  
Vetoed
3/24/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Override
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Override
3/29/23  
Enrolled
3/29/23  
Enrolled
3/30/23  
Chaptered
3/30/23  

Caption

AN ACT relating to government contract review and declaring an emergency.

Impact

The passage of HB 329 will modify existing legislative procedures regarding the approval of state contracts, ensuring that there is systematic oversight on how contracts are awarded and the purposes they serve. By institutionalizing this committee, state lawmakers aim to prevent potential misuse of taxpayer money and ensure that contracts align with the common good. The bill highlights a commitment to fiscal responsibility and reinforces the need for legislative scrutiny in state contracting processes.

Summary

House Bill 329 aims to establish a framework for the review of government contracts within the Commonwealth of Kentucky by creating a permanent Government Contract Review Committee. This committee's responsibilities include the evaluation of proposed personal service contracts, tax incentive agreements, and memoranda of agreement to ensure their appropriateness and necessity for the state. The bill stipulates that all such agreements submitted to the Legislative Research Commission must be reviewed within a 45-day timeframe, promoting accountability and transparency in the use of public funds.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 329 appears to be supportive among legislators focused on oversight and accountability, but it may also face scrutiny from those concerned about bureaucratic delays that could arise from the additional layer of review. Proponents advocate that such measures are necessary to safeguard against waste and inefficiency, while opponents may express concerns about hampering the speed of service delivery due to potential delays in contract approvals.

Contention

Discussions around HB 329 may involve points of contention regarding the balance between necessary oversight and the efficiency of government operations. While the intention is to enhance transparency, some critics argue that increased procedural requirements could slow down essential public services. The ongoing debate reflects a broader tension between ensuring responsible governance while maintaining operational agility within state agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

KY HB388

AN ACT relating to government contract review and declaring an emergency.

CA SB241

Personal Income Tax: California Voluntary Contribution Program.

KY HB512

AN ACT relating to personal service contracts.

CA SB34

Public contracts: authorized agent: limitations.

CA AB2310

Public Employees’ Retirement System: contracting members.

CA AB658

Public employment: retirement: benefits.

TX HB1846

Relating to public comments on federal grants and contracts related to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

LA SB235

Provides relative to requirements for certain public-private partnerships. (gov sig)