Georgia 2023-2024 Regular Session

Georgia Senate Bill SB345

Introduced
1/10/24  
Refer
1/11/24  
Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Refer
1/11/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Report Pass
2/29/24  
Engrossed
2/7/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Report Pass
2/29/24  
Chaptered
5/6/24  
Enrolled
4/2/24  
Chaptered
5/6/24  

Caption

Probate Court of Dooly County; assessment and collection of a technology fee; authorize

Impact

The legislation is expected to facilitate significant improvements in the operational capabilities of the Probate Court of Dooly County. By providing financial resources for necessary technological upgrades, the bill aims to modernize court systems, enhance record accessibility, and streamline workflows. Furthermore, the funds collected through this fee will be maintained in a segregated account specifically designated for technological expenses, allowing for more organized and directed spending in court modernization efforts. The authorization of the fee is set to terminate on July 1, 2034, ensuring that the collection period is clearly defined.

Summary

Senate Bill 345 aims to authorize the Probate Court of Dooly County to assess and collect a technology fee, not exceeding $5.00, for civil actions filed and as a surcharge on fines paid. The revenue generated from this fee will be explicitly allocated for technological enhancements within the Probate Court, including the purchase of computer hardware and software, maintenance of existing technology, and the digitization and archiving of court records. The fee structure is designed to ensure that the Probate Court can meet its technological needs effectively, thus improving overall court operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB345 appears to be largely positive, particularly among local officials who see the necessity of upgrading court technologies to meet contemporary demands. Advocates suggest that the introduction of a technology fee is a pragmatic approach to ensure that the Probate Court has adequate funding for essential technological advancements. However, some may raise concerns regarding the imposition of additional fees on court users, although these concerns were not prominently reported in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its intent to enhance court technology, there may be lingering concerns about the financial burden it places on individuals utilizing the court's services. The relatively small fee of $5.00 is unlikely to ignite major contention, but it raises questions about the overall accessibility of the Probate Court system and whether these fees could disproportionately affect those with limited financial resources. Additionally, the bill includes provisions for the use and eventual termination of the technology fee, which could ease some concerns regarding its long-term implications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

GA HB867

Bartow County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

GA HB979

Bartow County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

GA SB572

Probate Court of Morgan County; assessment and collection of a technology fee; authorize

GA SB339

Probate Court of Crisp County; assessment and collection of a technology fee; authorize

GA HB790

Macon County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of a technology fee

GA HB603

Banks County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of a technology fee

GA HB553

Taylor County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

GA HB538

Schley County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

GA HB1479

Ware County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

GA HB125

Harris County; Probate Court; authorize assessment and collection of technology fee

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.